{"id":16717,"date":"2010-02-09T06:42:36","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T05:42:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/?p=16717"},"modified":"2010-02-09T06:43:23","modified_gmt":"2010-02-09T05:43:23","slug":"lanti-twitter-di-google-per-gmail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/2010\/02\/09\/lanti-twitter-di-google-per-gmail\/","title":{"rendered":"L&#8217;anti Twitter di Google per Gmail"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703630404575053480962942848.html\">Il WSJ ha lanciato la notizia<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Google Inc. is taking a  swipe at Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc. with a new feature that makes it  easier for users of Gmail to view media and status updates shared  online by their friends.<\/p>\n<p>Google could announce the new Gmail feature as soon as this week,  said people familiar with the matter. A Google spokeswoman declined to  comment.<\/p>\n<p>The change adds a module to the Gmail screen that will display a  stream of updates from individuals a user chooses to connect with, said  one of these people. It is a format popularized by Facebook and Twitter.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/mashable.com\/2010\/02\/08\/google-gmail-social-event\/\">Mashable ha precisato le tempistiche della notizia<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We think that Google\u2019s (Google) new social status feature will be announced tomorrow. We have just received an invite to attend an event at Google\u2019s headquarters where it will be \u201cunveiling some product innovations in two of [its] most popular products.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The description fits very well with the WSJ report. Gmail (Gmail) is one of Google\u2019s most popular products, and this new social status update feature would be a \u201cproduct innovation\u201d within Gmail.<\/p>\n<p>As for what the other product getting new features may be, we can\u2019t say for certain. Picasa (Picasa), YouTube (YouTube), Google Friend Connect (google friend connect) and Google Accounts all seem like potential candidates.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Altri propongono idee per il G-Twitter (via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html\">Scripting News<\/a>)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>So here&#8217;s the list of must-have features:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html#p3\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/images\/2001\/09\/20\/sharpPermaLink3.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Permalink to this paragraph\" width=\"6\" height=\"9\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"p4\"><\/a>1. Reliability. Twitter still has trouble dealing  with high-flow events like last night&#8217;s SuperBowl. Lots of Fail Whales.  So if Google is able to offer reliability, no matter how much of an  advantage Twitter&#8217;s installed base is, it won&#8217;t matter. When Twitter  goes down everyone will reassemble on Glitter. \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html#p4\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/images\/2001\/09\/20\/sharpPermaLink3.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Permalink to this paragraph\" width=\"6\" height=\"9\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"p5\"><\/a>2. Enclosures. Can you imagine if you couldn&#8217;t  enclose a picture or an MP3 with an email message? Why do we jump  through so many hoops just to tweet a picture? \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html#p5\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/images\/2001\/09\/20\/sharpPermaLink3.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Permalink to this paragraph\" width=\"6\" height=\"9\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"p6\"><\/a>3. Open architecture metadata. Let developers throw  any data onto a status message, giving it a name and a type, and let  everyone else sort it out. It would result in an explosion of  creativity.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html#p6\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/images\/2001\/09\/20\/sharpPermaLink3.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Permalink to this paragraph\" width=\"6\" height=\"9\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"p7\"><\/a>4. Relationships with hardware vendors. I still want  a one-click <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2009\/12\/27\/comingsoonatwittercamera.html\">Twitter  camera<\/a>. If I can&#8217;t have it from Twitter, I&#8217;ll take it from Google.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html#p7\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/images\/2001\/09\/20\/sharpPermaLink3.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Permalink to this paragraph\" width=\"6\" height=\"9\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"p8\"><\/a>5. No 140-character limit. I debated this one with  myself. At first I compromised and said okay let&#8217;s have a 250-character  limit, or a 500-character limit. But I really don&#8217;t want a limit. If I  want to write short status messages, no problemmo. We&#8217;ve already made  the cultural transition. We know how to do it. But sometimes a thought  just can&#8217;t be expressed in 140 characters. No one is wise enough to know  what the limit is, so let&#8217;s just not have one.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html#p8\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/images\/2001\/09\/20\/sharpPermaLink3.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Permalink to this paragraph\" width=\"6\" height=\"9\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"p9\"><\/a>6. No URL-shorteners. I&#8217;ve explained this so many times. They&#8217;re stupid and ugly and they hurt the web. I  like it when developers take the time to craft their URLs so they make  sense to users. That&#8217;s all the shortening we really need and all we  should have.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/stories\/2010\/02\/08\/musthaveFeaturesForTwitter.html#p9\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scripting.com\/images\/2001\/09\/20\/sharpPermaLink3.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Permalink to this paragraph\" width=\"6\" height=\"9\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"p10\"><\/a>Those are some of my wish-list items. It seems  likely Google will offer #1 and #2. Very unlikely they&#8217;ll do #3 (they  don&#8217;t trust developers any more than Apple does). Probably not #4,  though it would be easy to get some people from Kodak and Sony to come  on stage with them. #5 would take a teeny bit of guts. It&#8217;s a perfect  way to throw some serious confusion at Twitter. I&#8217;d recommend going all  the way, but if they can&#8217;t, go to 500-characters. Get some editors and  authors on stage to say how nice it would be. Because they&#8217;re making a  commitment to their own URL-shortener it seems unlikely they would  outlaw them on their status network, but one can hope.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Il WSJ ha lanciato la notizia Google Inc. is taking a swipe at Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc. with a new feature that makes it easier for users of Gmail to view media and status updates shared online by their friends. Google could announce the new Gmail feature as soon as this week, said people &#8230; <a title=\"L&#8217;anti Twitter di Google per Gmail\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/2010\/02\/09\/lanti-twitter-di-google-per-gmail\/\" aria-label=\"Per saperne di pi\u00f9 su L&#8217;anti Twitter di Google per Gmail\">Leggi tutto<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,6],"tags":[162,344],"class_list":["post-16717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economia","category-internet","tag-google","tag-twitter"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16717"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16717\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16719,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16717\/revisions\/16719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}