{"id":20112,"date":"2010-07-05T06:50:30","date_gmt":"2010-07-05T04:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/?p=20112"},"modified":"2010-07-05T10:52:25","modified_gmt":"2010-07-05T08:52:25","slug":"sullusabilita-delluso-degli-ebook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/2010\/07\/05\/sullusabilita-delluso-degli-ebook\/","title":{"rendered":"Sull&#8217;usabilit\u00e0 dell&#8217;uso degli ebook"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.useit.com\/alertbox\/ipad-kindle-reading.html\">Jakob  Nielsen testa la lettura sugli ebook reader<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The iPad measured at 6.2% lower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at 10.7%  slower than print. However, the difference between the two  devices was not statistically significant because of the data&#8217;s fairly  high variability.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the only fair conclusion is that we can&#8217;t say for sure  which device offers the fastest reading speed. In any case, the  difference would be so small that it wouldn&#8217;t be a reason to buy one  over the other.<\/p>\n<p>But we can say that tablets still haven&#8217;t beaten the printed  book: the difference between Kindle and the book was  significant at the p&lt;.01 level, and the difference between  iPad and the book was marginally significant at p=.06.<\/p>\n<p>After using each device, we asked users to rate their satisfaction on a  1\u20137 scale, with 7 being the best score.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>iPad, Kindle, and the printed book all scored fairly high at 5.8, 5.7,  and 5.6, respectively. The PC,  however, scored an abysmal 3.6.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the users&#8217; free-form comments were predictable. For example,  they disliked that the iPad was so heavy and that the Kindle featured  less-crisp gray-on-gray letters. People also disliked the lack of true  pagination and preferred the way the iPad (actually, the iBook app)  indicated the amount of text left in a chapter.<\/p>\n<p>Less predictable comments: Users felt that reading the printed book was  more relaxing than using electronic devices. And they felt uncomfortable  with the PC because it reminded them of work.<\/p>\n<p>This study is promising for the future of e-readers and tablet  computers. We can expect higher-quality screens in the future,  as indicated by the recent release of the iPhone 4 with a 326 dpi  display. But even the current generation is almost as good as print in  formal performance metrics \u2014 and actually scores slightly higher in user  satisfaction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jakob Nielsen testa la lettura sugli ebook reader The iPad measured at 6.2% lower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at 10.7% slower than print. However, the difference between the two devices was not statistically significant because of the data&#8217;s fairly high variability. Thus, the only fair conclusion is that we &#8230; <a title=\"Sull&#8217;usabilit\u00e0 dell&#8217;uso degli ebook\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/2010\/07\/05\/sullusabilita-delluso-degli-ebook\/\" aria-label=\"Per saperne di pi\u00f9 su Sull&#8217;usabilit\u00e0 dell&#8217;uso degli ebook\">Leggi tutto<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33,32],"tags":[118,1403],"class_list":["post-20112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computer","category-pensieri","tag-ebook","tag-usabilita"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20112"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20116,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20112\/revisions\/20116"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}