{"id":23426,"date":"2010-12-29T00:42:11","date_gmt":"2010-12-28T23:42:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/?p=23426"},"modified":"2010-12-29T00:42:11","modified_gmt":"2010-12-28T23:42:11","slug":"lequazione-wikileaks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/2010\/12\/29\/lequazione-wikileaks\/","title":{"rendered":"L’equazione Wikileaks"},"content":{"rendered":"

Via Columbia Journalism Rewiev<\/a><\/p>\n

WikiLeaks\u2019s handling of the State Department cables has been markedly different. Rather than make the mass of documents available in a single bulk disclosure, WikiLeaks has instead been publishing cables drip by drip, redacting sections of some after weighing input from the newspapers who sought comment from U.S. officials. Of a 250,000-document trove, just a small fraction have been put online, many with redactions recommended, in full or in part, by the news organizations who had access to the documents and who likely went to the government for comment.<\/p>\n

Assange spelled out his motivation for using this method in an interview with The Times<\/em> of London. \u201cIn our case nearly every single redaction [to the cables] has been done for political reasons. It\u2019s not a moral question. It was done to prevent journalistic opportunists and the U.S. Government from trying to distract from the main game,\u201d Assange said.<\/p>\n

That quote suggests that Assange might not see the moral necessity of redacting the names of innocents who could come to harm from having their names exposed. Nonetheless, for now, WikiLeaks is releasing documents with more caution. Replicating WikiLeaks is easy, and there\u2019s nothing to say that every future iteration of something like WikiLeaks would do the same. It\u2019s a frightening prospect.<\/p>\n

But the idea that the solution to this potential problem lies in uprooting freedom of speech, and the status quo that has allowed the press to be a persistent, comprehensive watchdog of the national security state is frightening, too.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Via Columbia Journalism Rewiev WikiLeaks\u2019s handling of the State Department cables has been markedly different. Rather than make the mass of documents available in a single bulk disclosure, WikiLeaks has instead been publishing cables drip by drip, redacting sections of some after weighing input from the newspapers who sought comment from U.S. officials. Of a … Leggi tutto<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,30],"tags":[1334],"class_list":["post-23426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet","category-media","tag-wikileaks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23426"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23427,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23426\/revisions\/23427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pasteris.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}